If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
1st type/2nd type differentiation with different minting years given the addition of country identification on the national side of coins.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
These tokens were produced in London and used througout the colonies, including New Zealand. But all sources say that main circulation was in Australia. So I think we should remove these New Zealand coin sheets.
I checked the last 50 or so Auction results from Numismatic Auction houses and 100% placed these under Australia
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
As the referee for Australia I would recommend moving all entries of this token to the Colonial Australia catalog. While these tokens did circulate in both Colonial Australia and New Zealand, for obvious reasons they would have seen more circulation on the Australian continent. That is my reasoning for them to be in the Colonial Australia catalog.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
The three coins listed under the Duchy of Livonia are all fine, but the problem is with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ones. The former was a territory of the latter, so any coins listed as "Ryga Mint" were issued for the Duchy of Livonia. A lot of the Polish-Lithuanian coins are also split by the Kopicki catalogue, and I believe each Kop number is for a different date, meaning there is a lot to correct. The seven Trojaks should be deleted (they are the same as the first 3 Gros coin), the Sezlag should be deleted (it is the same as the Schilling), and the Portugał ryski should be deleted (it is the same as the 10 Ducat piece). Everything else should be moved under the Duchy of Livonia
And that should be all of them. The names of the rulers on some Livonian coins are not English-a-fied, like the Polish-Lithuanian ones, and the denominations are not consistent. Neither is the spelling of Riga. But those are all separate issues.
First:
All Polish collectors, all Polish catalogs, all Polish sites, auctions houses, even on foreign auction houses Riga coins from this period are mentioned as Polish Lithuanian Commonweath, this is a fact, so why numista wants to change history ?
Second:
We have the same situation with coins minted during Russian Empire occupation, with coins minted in Warsaw (kopeks, they are not under Poland but under Russia: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63934.html
or minted during occupation of Vien by Third Reich, they are under Third Reich:
Third:
If on coin there is Step D G REX PO M D L = the king of Poland and Dux of Lithuania it means no dux / king / or empire of Riga
Fourthly: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monety_miejskie_Rygi_(1581%E2%80%931622) Po przejęciu Rygi przez Stefana Batorego miejska mennica przystąpiła do zmiany stempli oraz podjęcia produkcji nowych monet, na podstawie obowiązujących w całej Rzeczypospolitej ordynacji menniczych opartych na grzywnie krakowskiej.
After the takeover of Riga by Stefan Batory, the city mint commenced the change of stamps and the production of new coins on the basis of the minting regulations applicable in the entire Polish Lithuanian Commonweath based on the Krakow fine.
I canot agree for wasting my job and changing history. You can leave your part in Livonia catalog, with comment "there is the same coin in Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth" and collectors will chose where to enter his / her coin at its own discretion. This is only solution.
(I am not sure how to do multiple quotes in one post, so I will just reply to each point separately.)
1) What about non Polish-Biased places? Of course, places centred around Latvia/Estonia would favour the coins in Riga, like Haljak Acutions: https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=1435&lot=184. Since Polish-Lithuania was in control, that link does mention Polish-Lithuania, but in the same way they mention Sweden on Swedish Livonian coins (Polish-Lithuanian control of Riga; Swedish control of Riga).
3) If you take some of the coins from Swedish Livonia, it is in a similar way: CAROLVS D G REX SV; Carl XI, with God's grace, King of Sweden. The ruler of Sweden was the top person, and yet none of those coins are listed under Sweden. The Duchy of Livonia would be like a Polish-Lithuanian Livonia (or Riga).
4) I guess you and I interpret "On the basis of the minting regulations applicable in the entire [...]" differently. With Livonia/Riga being under control by the Polish-Lithuanians, they had to change their monetary system to match those who controlled them. They did the same during Swedish control. That way, local coins could circulate alongside the ones issued by the controller.
5) More people have the first one checked off compared to the second, so I would say yes to deleting the page with less people. I do not think the same coin should exist in two different places, so if one is to go, it would take the least amount of work that way. And of course, the cataoluge numbers can always be transfered.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
The information in first one is a little better, so please delete the second one.
Mintage date for both of them is incorrect. Year must be: 1370-1386 (in Persian calendar)
Hello.
Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
Hello.
Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
Hi,
I searched for it (in Numismaster site) there is no such a coin as KM#B1264
and yes. year list in first coin is not correct. My fault.
Year list must be 1370-1386 (Persian calendar)
Hello.
Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
Hi,
I searched for it (in Numismaster site) there is no such a coin as KM#B1264
and yes. year list in first coin is not correct. My fault.
Year list must be 1370-1386 (Persian calendar)
Then I suggest first complete the first page, and then delete the second page.
Hello.
Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
Hi,
I searched for it (in Numismaster site) there is no such a coin as KM#B1264
and yes. year list in first coin is not correct. My fault.
Year list must be 1370-1386 (Persian calendar)
Then I suggest first complete the first page, and then delete the second page.
Yes, both those Ottoman coins are the same. The year written on the coins is a frozen date, 1223, with a regnal year (in this case, 22 to 25). The pages are just formatted differently.
1223 is written on the coin, which does translate to 1808 in the Gregorian calendar, as the first page says. 1223 with regnal year 22 is 1829, 1223 with regnal year 23 is 1830, and so on (which is reflected in the comments).
On the second page, 1244 is written nowhere on the coin, but that is the date you need to get the brackets to say 1829.
This is how the pages look, looking at it like: date - (bracket date) - mint letter - comment
1223 - (1808) - 22 - 1829
1244 - (1829) - 22 - 1223
This is how the pages should both probably look:
1223 (1829) - 22 - No comment (unless you want the date shown in Arabic numerals, which could be beneficial).
I heard somewhere the referee might be able to manually change the dates in the brackets, but I remember seeing many coins not like that in the Ottoman Empire, so maybe that is not the case. Overall, the first page probably has the more correct format (as well as more information), but... it has the wrong pictures displayed. The ones it shows are of KM#599. Also, all these coins would have a regnal year, and I have never heard of nor seen a dateless one of these. Maybe those lines are there for really worn coins? I would think to delete those two lines, but I do not think I can make that call.
@Sulfur
Thanks for typing all that, I wanted to type out an explanation but was too tired to do it earlier. First coin should be kept IMO.
Speaking of bracketed dates, this isn't a duplicate; there's a few coins in Egypt (and maybe a few other Islamic calendar countries) that have a Gregorian date on the coin, yet are still bracketed.
It might actually be more easy to search if the Gregorian date is in the brackets on those coins. In the advanced search, 1335 can be typed into "Year" and 1916 can be typed into "Gregorian date", and the same coin will come up in both searches.
The problem with Ottoman coins (and other coins that use regnal years) is that the system that converts Arabic dates into the Gregorian calendar does not take the regnal year into consideration (like this one: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113400.html).
(Although, this topic should probably be in its own thread so the Duplicate Listings one will not stray off-topic. )
Απόσπασμα: "CassTaylor"
Speaking of bracketed dates, this isn't a duplicate; there's a few coins in Egypt (and maybe a few other Islamic calendar countries) that have a Gregorian date on the coin, yet are still bracketed.
Example:https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5592.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.