Absurd in Oman 1 rial [επιλυμένο]

The article

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note208985.html

in Variety section has
1427 (2006) 10% incorrect date on face
1437 (2016) 95% corrected date on face

Note. Obviously the percentage is from wrongly described occurrence of lines and has nothing to do with frequency as it expected to be. This is not the case of this topic.

Due to note in follows the percentage is omitted in description, though it it present in the article.

Instead of

1427 (2006) incorrect date on face

there should be
1427 (2016) incorrect date on face



Indeed, it is not standard case, it is typo on banknote: there was 1427-2016 in Eastern Arabic numerals instead of 1437-2016: they made mistake in one digit not in two!

Most probably, to correct it a site developer's intervention is required. This case, from my experience is similar to Iranian coinage such as https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3763.html
where the dates in two local calendars goes chronologically switching from Muslim to Ancient and than back, providing both calendars being in the same article.

Right now no collector can mark a mistake banknote with such description.

I would like an arabic speaker who has these notes to speak as well, because it looks to me like the note in the image also has a 2015 date...

Yeah, not absurd, but common error. Error dates should, for sake of catalogue searches, have error date shown in comments, sp it wont interfere with search results.

Our automatic conversion has 1437 set to 2016, so I manually changed that to 2015. And the error date is now moved to the comments section.