There was a coin in 5th edition of the World Coins Catalog - Israel KM# 435 2 Sheqalim 2005.
It is very much similar to Israel KM# 433 2 Sheqalim 2008-... - https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5579.html
In 6th edition it was removed, also it's missing on numismaster.com .
But it's still in Numista catalog: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces17423.html
The pictures show the same KM# 233 2008.
Numista Rarity index: 70 - that means some collectors marked that they have it. 4 collectors offer it for a swap.
Can anyone comment, what's true? Is it a real coin? Or should it be merged with KM# 233?
ΑπόσπασμαKM# 435 2 NEW SHEQALIM
5.6000 g., Nickel Plated Steel, 21.48 mm. Obv: Large value
Rev: Small national arms above stylized double cornucopiae
Edge: Segmented reeding
Date Mintage F VF XF Unc BU
JE5765(2005) — — — — 1.50 —
and
ΑπόσπασμαKM# 433 2 NEW SHEQALIM
5.7000 g., Nickel-Plated Steel, 21.6 mm. Obv: Value, date and
inscriptions Rev: Double cornucopiae (horns of plenty) draped
in ribbons and filled with fruit and grain including a pomegranate
Edge: Plain with 4 notches
Date Mintage F VF XF Unc BU
JE5768 (2008)(u) — — — — 1.50 —
Numismaster only lists KM#433, while KM#435 is missing completey. Worldcoingallery has KM#433 only,
too. The Internet does not know about a 2005 issue either. My Schön & Schän catalog is not new
enough to know any of these coins. Only chance is to ask all users claiming to have a KM#435
and check for the hebrew dates. However, interesting fact that both were listed with different
edge design.
a lot of users already answered. the results so far:
all of these admitted that they mistakenly took the closed date letter in KM#433 for an open "ה" one
in התשס״ה in KM#435. which seems you're right that 2005 does not exist but is rather an error of
Krause that they amended in recent editions. however, users report in that they have different
edge design (segmented and complete reeding or similar). I wait for images and further details.
maybe this is why WC confused them and created two different entries
that is because users already transferred their entries to the correct sheet
weeellll - seems we have to wait a bit longer. I want to give all of the chance to transfer their
collection on their own. other than that I will inform Xavier (the admin of Numista) to have permission
to transfer them all in a week or so. after that - the false entry will be deleted.
results so far: about 7-8 users already transferred their entry - it IS an error.
no one reports in that he/she really has a 2005 issue.