Mess in France 100 francs 1950-1959

The article
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces688.html
has inaccurate information in comments.

1. Duplication of images: the first and the third are the same
2. The last image is a personal note. This information is not mentioned in mintage section as well. As the result the information is confusing. It is catalog that is why it should describe on which coins such differences in position of letter B are known: by years or there is one(a few) year(s) when both styles are known.

Is it possible to present this last image in understandable for attribution way?

Ole

*sigh*

Απόσπασμα: "cyprusalexander"​The article
​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces688.html
​has inaccurate information in comments.
​
​1. Duplication of images: the first and the third are the same
​2. The last image is a personal note. This information is not mentioned in mintage section as well. As the result the information is confusing. It is catalog that is why it should describe on which coins such differences in position of letter B are known: by years or there is one(a few) year(s) when both styles are known.
​
​Is it possible to present this last image in understandable for attribution way?

1) Indeed
​2) You are wrong.
The text means this mark appears at various locations in this area. It's only informative ; there is no need to add all the exact positions of the B on the list as it probably slightly changed from one die to another (it would be way too complicated for everyone !).

I don't see what is the problem with this last picture by the way. Even an English speaker can understand what this text means

This page is much more accurate than your title / message :s

Great. We have movement.
For the first the modification request is sent.
For the second it still requires clarification. No one till now present the necessary information.

It is not enough to mention that there is difference, it is a must for catalog to describe it properly.

For example, all known to me years of the emission have style of the right image (as far as I can see them). The person, who put this information most probably kept these two coins in hands. Is it possible to present images of both sides of each of these 2 coins, according to standard procedure? Or at least mention which years are they? In this way at least the information may get sense.

With what we have now we can suppose anything. Here are a few examples:

1. One year had left image, others - right.
2. In two years there are coins of both images.
3. Add by yourself

Comment.
1. Nothing special.
2. It is the challenge to look for other years and you are right there is possibility to find position of 'B' in between.
3. You already see, that depending on the correct information the different outcomes are possible.

As for the different position of mintmark Ole already put one documentation for 5 centimes and I supplied him in private message with images of 1 franc in aluminum. But all that is organized in understandable 'even for English reader' way of course.