How are these listings getting published in the main catalogue

Every once in a while, I like to browse the 'Latest coins' section and I just recently came across these beauties:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136149.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136630.html

With all due respect to the referee(s) involved, it would appear that a little more care needs to be taken when validating modification requests?

You're absolutely right, Rick.

I too browse the catalogue freely in my spare time, and once in a while I see "coins" like these listed:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces88453.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces141731.html

Appearing in a little section of it's own, when it should be in Exonumia or Tokens, completely out of place and being a major blemish on an otherwise well-maintained page of listings... I would never tolerate that kind of misplacement in one of my responsible countries. A while back there was even a temple token or two listed in British India.....

I don't even bother making the move edits myself anymore because sometimes they get rejected (through ignorance or incompetence I do not know) and I have to appeal to a master ref/catalogue admin to get it done. Simply not worth my time to deal with anymore.

Απόσπασμα: "radrick007" With all due respect to the referee(s) involved, it would appear that a little more care needs to be taken when validating modification requests?

Yes, with all due respect, let's all please take some pride in our work.

I already messaged the respective referee. These look horrible.

Απόσπασμα: "Jarcek"​I already messaged the respective referee. These look horrible.

​Thank you for that but sadly, these are but two examples of what I believe to be a much larger issue across several areas of the catalogue and which threatens to tarnish the high reputation of the Numista catalogue.