KM# and sub-KM#

Hello, dear referees and catalogue builders.

I have a question:

Why in one case I see subtypes as separate page/picture/description, and in other cases subtypes are under same page?

For example:
Angola countermarked coinage: KM# 50.1 and KM# 50.2 and KM# 50.3 are listed as different coins/pages,
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces44248.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces53411.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces53415.html

 While Egypt KM# 622.1 and 622.2 are under one page/picture.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1816.html

 So, if we have a chance to put coin sub-type as separate report, can we do it? Are we free in this action? For example, I have my own Egypt KM# 622.2 (denomination shaded, rare subtype), and can I add it as different page?

Thanks, and hope you understand my question (sorry for my English)
regards
David

Hi!
Usually, KM-sub types should be on one page only. But the answer on Your question about Angola is that it is like this because here is really big big mess and nobody take care of it.
Regards
Kuna

well, thank you, Kuna.
Actually, frequently there are  a very big difference in coin design, and  for me, it should be better to  add also at least subtypes` images in same page.
 
About  mess, - yes,  I agree, but I hope it will be  perfected.

Best regards
 David

It could be solved. Some time.....

No this is incorrect, countermarked coinage are listed as subtypes but separated because the host coins are different. This makes identification easier.

well, but   Bone  Chambre de Commerce  coins  also reported as different  coins/pages/ images. And, they are not countermarked coins.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces8893.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces54765.html

is it mistake or not?

 and, please  tell me if there is a rule for adding  such coins. Now, I doscovered, that  in case of countermarked  coins, we  add them as diffeent coins. ok.  Is there any other  exeption? or only c/m coins?

They are technically different types, and I think one of them is unlisted in WC. You're right that they should be merged though, and coins with different sizes are listed separately too despite variety numbers.

Απόσπασμα: SmartOneKgcoins with different sizes are listed separately too despite variety numbers.

Really??? Not this one for example:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3964.html?mobile=0

 

They should be separated, if anyone is willing.

It is simply a leadership failure of consistency, David.