separate yearline for straight G variety

Hello eveyone. Now that this variety is published on the catalog  as an example of types , isn’t it necessary for a separate yearline  on the catalog too? 
i noticed that example of types normally appears based on a variant specified on the catalog…Otherwise , such sample may or can be wrongfully classified the other way.

just sharing my opinion & wish to seek answers and clarification. 
thanking you all again in advance.

Sorry, but what is the accepted “G” variety? I just never heard about it?

Hello my good Sir. Like i said, it is already published on the example of types column on the catalog. I guess it passes the validation process with the supporting details with it.

my inquiry ended up giving me options to share this variety for the record and purposely for the community. 

If i may , My good Sir, you may find it easy to understand everything if you kindly visits the discussions

that gone thru from my inquiry section.

it was the reason too that inclined  me to raise an opinion But not pushing anything.

Thanks ABBE,

but what is the G variety?

Ah, I see, you think everybody has read this https://en.numista.com/forum/topic156958.html#p1225869?

So in the end you're talking about this:

It has nothing to do with the accented hair variety proof coins anymore though i used it primarily as an example & as a basis. 
the exposure of the concrete data of Sir manny57 referring exactly to the regular strike coin with that  straight G variety is the subject.

and the reason too why im inclined to raise my opinion is merely a curiousity too.

thanking you too My good Sir.

@ABBE   As @TonyCoins suggested on the other post there are numerous minor varieties that would overwhelm the catalog if all were entered as separate year lines.  https://en.numista.com/forum/topic156958.html#p1315465 As he also pointed out you can submit a CR to add the year line. https://en.numista.com/forum/topic156958.html#p1315471 

If you think that's the right thing to do then just do it. Why start another post to rehash everything? 

My good Sir, i clearly remember everything. 
actually its the very reason why i raised additional opinion because i think i see it the other way.

the more entries the catalog have, the better I guess.

but with respect to your ideas, works and expertise Then im done . 

like i said, im not pushing it . Im respecting it the way you want it to be.

thanking you all again My good Sirs.

And lastly,  i dont intend to repeat  everything again, so happen, to my surprise too , that Sir Sjoelund doesnt know anything yet and keep asking too ,so i was forced to repeat it for him. and even redirected him to make it short for me. I shared my opinion because All i ever wanted to know  is to make sure if it is necessary before doing so . i couldnt just take action based on my own.