Should this Danish West Indies coin be split?

I was adding DNF numbers to the DWI and noticed this coins having two different reverse legends:

First line (1748)

KM#6.1 "DANSK AMERIC INSULER"

Where the rest have the legend of:

“DANSKE AMERICANSK M”

The coin in question:

N#29557

Poking the referee: @T0r 

Variations should be listed on the same page, according to the catalog guidelines. In this case I'd be inclined to say it's more of a variety than something warranting separate pages.

Referring to: https://en.numista.com/help/coin-varieties-and-variations-146.html

Then I'll argue the line between type and variant becomes increasingly blurry.

Some coins from eg. Glückstadt are devided between bust types and legends.

For instance I find these very similar:

N#199856

N#199893

It doesn't seem like an error, on the DWI coin and the guidlines says:

“Legend varieties (different dates, mints, officinae, punctuation, layout, abbreviations, mint or engraver marks)”, which doesn't seem to be the case for my understanding.

Glückstadt:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?e=gluckstadt_city&r=&st=1-2-154-5-72-148&cat=y&im1=&im2=&ru=&ie=&ca=3&no=&v=&a=&dg=&i=&b=&m=&f=&t=&t2=&w=&mt=&u=&g=&se=&c=&wi=&sw=

The Numista definition of Type says:

Coin types are split on independent pages when they feature:

• Different legends or countermarks

It seems reasonable to me to argue that exchanging “AMERIC” and “AMERICANSK” or “DANSKE” and “DANSK” is just a legend variation, but swapping “INSULER” for “M” seems to me to be in the “different legend” category and not just a variation.

bjherbison

The Numista definition of Type says:

Coin types are split on independent pages when they feature:

• Different legends or countermarks

It seems reasonable to me to argue that exchanging “AMERIC” and “AMERICANSK” or “DANSKE” and “DANSK” is just a legend variation, but swapping “INSULER” for “M” seems to me to be in the “different legend” category and not just a variation.

+1