The 2011 note on the site is listed as ND when the date is given on the note. Rather than ND, I believe the note year should be listed as 2011(2000) as the note is from 2011 but dated 2000. ND isn’t accurate as there is a date on the note.
There are now dates not just years, I have seen this when adding sub references to year lines … something a programmer might need to look at or editing the database years needs to be refined.
There are now dates not just years, I have seen this when adding sub references to year lines … something a programmer might need to look at or editing the database years needs to be refined.
We now have 2000-Dec-29 (2010) on a line for example implying there is a date 29th of December 2000 on the note but in reality there is only a 2000 in the corner.
It is also an issue because it most likely wasn't your intention and as such it should be looked at what went wrong.
We now have 2000-Dec-29 (2010) on a line for example implying there is a date 29th of December 2000 on the note but in reality there is only a 2000 in the corner.
It is also an issue because it most likely wasn't your intention and as such it should be looked at what went wrong.
Fixed
Those dates were already in the Back office, so I presume they were an old deprecated info from a long time ago which were reactivated somehow when I displayed date
